Interview with Dr Kamran Mofid
of the Globalisation for the Common Good Initiative

Photo: Dr Benjamin MacQueen (left), Dr Kamran Mofid (right)
Inter-faith dialogue has emerged in recent years as a nexus where scholars, theologians, conflict-resolution practitioners and concerned citizens have engaged one another to discuss ‘big picture’ human concerns, from conflict to migration, the environment, technology and poverty.
Dr Kamran Mofid has been a pioneer in this field, establishing Globalisation for the Common Good (GCG) in 2002 as an organisation aimed at, in their own words, “rekindling the human spirit and compassion in globalisation”. This organisation has grown into a global community, promoting awareness through landmark conferences, lectures and their publication, the Journal of Globalisation for the Common Good.
In 2008, the GCG will host its 8th annual conference in Melbourne with the keynote speaker being former Iranian President and catalyst for the establishment of the United Nation’s ‘Year of Dialogue of Civilisations’ in 2001, Seyyed Mohammad Khatami. On Friday March 7 2008, Dr Mofid visited NCEIS, where he spoke to Dr Benjamin MacQueen.
Transcript: Friday 7 March 2008
| BM: | Your recent research has helped highlight how post-enlightenment economic rationalism has really removed human needs concerns from economic equations, placing the development of markets, the maximisation of profit, as ends in and of themselves. And, this … has undermined the very principles of needs fulfilment that these markets were originally designed to meet. How have you proposed the incorporation of religion, theology or spirituality even, back into economics can help reintroduce these human needs concerns? |
| KM: | Okay, okay, that’s a very good question. And, I have to look for what I want to read to you. As you know, I taught economics at the University level for over 20 years. And, I had. I was privileged to engage with many students from many different walks of life, different countries, different religions and cultures. And, I taught economics to them in a very secular, value free way. And now, let me tell you what I shared with my students, what I taught them. I told them to create wealth, but I did not tell them for what reason; I told them about scarcity and competition, but not about abundance and corporation; I told them about free trade, but not about fair trade, about gross national product, but not about gross national happiness; I told them about profit maximisation and cost minimisation, about the highest returns to the shareholders, but not about social consciousness, accountability to the community, sustainability, and respect for the creation and the creator. I did not tell them that without humanity, economics is a house of cards built on shifting sands. Where was the economic theory that reflected my students’ real lives? All these things led me to reflect about what I was teaching my students and the way I was engaging with my students. And at the end, it brought me heartache, because I wanted to have a different kind of dialogue, a different kind of teaching. I did not want to reject economics – economics is important, commerce is important, accountancy is important, management is important, Department of Economics is important, MBA program is important. But, I wanted to have an opportunity to share with my students something that they can feel is a part of the real life, rather than something in isolation and abstract. And for that, I had to search for bigger pictures. I had to search for the fundamental values that are not necessarily economics in nature. And, this is when I decided to become a student again, because I started a journey of self searching. I wanted to rediscover myself. That journey of the discovery led me to the Department of Theology at the Plato Collage in Oxford, where I became a student. And, as I was searching for the biggest picture has meant that I have got to go and study theology, philosophy, to find out in my own head, all these economic theories, all these sophisticated and elegant mathematical models that I had learnt and I was teaching my students, to find what kind of relevance they have got to the real world, to the bigger picture. And, that’s why I went the path that I took, the path to become a student, to learn theology, religions and philosophy. |
| BM: | So it was a very personal journey – |
| KM: | It was a very personal journey, but it was the personal journey that was the product of my academic and professional journey. The academic and professional led me to go and search for that personal journey as well, and that’s what made it so wonderful and a beautiful journey for me, because I wanted to make that journey. |
| BM: | And this journey has resulted in one of many things, the creation of globalisation for the common good – |
| KM: | Absolutely |
| BM: | Tell us a little bit about that… |
| KM: | When I was doing theology, I discovered that indeed, economics and theology are very similar. Both of them want to make us happy, both of them want to give us happiness. Economics gives us happiness through encouragement of possession, materialism, consumerism, and all other values of that nature, and is a kind of happiness that is never is delivered, because it is transient. I buy the BMW, I am very happy, you come and buy the Ferrari, I am not happy anymore, because you’ve got something better than me. Somebody comes tomorrow and gets something better than what you have, again, your transient happiness is over because you’re not as high as he or she is. Religion wants to make us happy as well, but not through materialism, not through consumerism, but through service, through vocation, through altruism, through knowing and serving the common good, and is a happiness that is delivered. Have you stopped, have you wondered, why is it that so many, for example, Chief Executives, at the height of their career, with all the power, with all that money that they’re making, with all that possession that they’ve accumulated, they go through tremendous bad times and depression and so on, they give it all up. I have seen them with my own eyes, I have communication with them, I have worked with them, and they go for example, in shanty towns Nairobi where I met a few, and they’re working in the orphanages, they were working with people suffering with AIDS. Why do they do that, because that is a kind of permanent happiness that they can receive. Why is it that so many rich people when they reached to the height of their wealth, all of a sudden they give everything away? This is a kind of happiness. Again, it was at that time that I discovered that I have got as if somebody has put a mission in front of me, that I have got to do it, to bringing economics and theology together. Again, I emphasise again, because they worked together for centuries, and economics was always a part of theology, but after the industrial revolution in Britain and so on, we wanted to make Man free of moral obligation, to allowing him to go and make as much money as possible without the burden of ethics and morality in the back of his mind. So, we turn economics into the branch of the political economy, and the last few decades have even become worse, because it has become so much mathematical economics, only concerned about the things that it can measure. |
| BM: | Econometrics and these sorts of fields |
| KM: | That’s right. All about things that it can measure. It can measure inflation rate, it can measure unemployment rate, but where is the measurement of the consequences of unemployment? Where is the measure of the consequences of outsourcing? When houses or people lose their jobs, many who commit suicide because they lose honour, dignity, providing for the family is all gone, it’s all finished, they commit suicide, alcoholism, drug abuse and so on. So, we have got to have a system that it is not value free. That my job is only to ensure a low inflation economy, high growth economy. These are important, I’m not going to dispute about that, but I also want to have an economic system and thinking that takes into account the consequences of those measures, because it cannot be value free if I do something that affects you, and I’ve got consequences on you, therefore my action cannot be value free. But now, modern economics is value free. |
| BM: | It reminds me of the work of John Ralston Saul, his writing on equilibrium balance – do you find similarities with those approaches? – |
| KM: | Yes |
| BM: | …Reintroducing…as much as it’s human emotion, it is about balance and equilibrium across all elements of human existence. |
| KM: | Absolutely, I support that. We have got to do that because we are not created only as economic animals, only ticked by economic things. We are kind of creation that we want society, community, friendship, dialogue, when I say for example in economics I talk so much about individualism, selfishness, how wrong I was. This is not true, we human beings are not created selfish and individualistic. You may ask me why, what gives you the right to ask this question, to say this statement? The reason for it is when we come to this world, when our mother gives birth to us, if the mother does not look after us, within 2-3 hours we are dead. It is that dependency that gives rise to life. We do not come to this world independent, selfish, and greedy, because mother gives us the milk, without that, if the mother says “Okay you are born, go look after yourself”, there would have been no world as we know it today. So, when we all are dependent on that love, on that relationship, when we are the product of the family, brothers, sisters, mother, father and then the larger family, we don’t treat each other individualistically and selfishly. |
| BM: | It’s an embrace of our socialistic nature. |
| KM: | Absolutely. So, how can is it that we are the product of love and dependency, and then they tell us the world is such a competitive world, and we are here on our own, there is nothing in the world as a society. Margaret Thatcher once quoted that there is no such thing as a society in Britain. No. We are here to be together, sharing together, benefiting together, cooperating with each other. Why is it that the first thing that I taught my students, the first lesson in economics, I told them this world is such a competitive world and that is a world of scarcity. How can it be, the world of scarcity that in England now, everything is for sale, two for the price of one? Everywhere you go in the supermarkets, two melons for the price of one. Two fruit basket for the price of one. Two chickens for the price of one, so where is that scarcity? I’ve told my students that they should always look for the lowest cost, consumers look for the lowest cost to exercise when they buy something. Again, that is not true. In England now, and I think it’s in Australia the same and elsewhere, there has been a huge rise in fair trade products, ethical products, and usually these things are more expensive than the alternative. We are now spending – I think in England – 600 or 700 million pounds, where a few years ago it was nothing, on fair product – coffee, tea, bananas, clothes and so on. And, many people willingly are paying more for the same product that they would have gotten cheaper are not alternative. So, why is it that people are paying more? Because it gives them happiness that by paying more for this coffee, that more money is going to provide a clinic, a running water, sanitation, for the coffee workers and the farmers. It gives them satisfaction, it gives them happiness. Therefore, there is more to life than the lowest prices, there is more to life than always searching for the lowest price, if there is something else that makes you happy as well. So, let us talk about these issues, let us enlarge the debate and bring other human values rather than selfishness, greed, consumerism, possession, power, and so on. And then I think, we can create a world that we can be more proud than the world that we are living in at the moment. The world we are living in at the moment is not anything that we can take pride of. So much misery in advance countries, and so much different kind of miseries in countries who are not as advance as we are – look at Iraq, look at Afghanistan, look at the Middle East and at the sort of misery. Look at the West, with all these possessions, with all these consumerism – depression, anxiety, fear, family breakdown, suicide, doctors so busy prescribing depression tablets and so on. So what is going on? What is going on? We have to ask the big questions. |
| BM: | There’s something missing… |
| KM: | Something missing, something wrong, and unless we come to a situation in which that we are dignified enough, honoured enough, truthful enough to discuss these issues, we get degrees and we give degrees and we give this, we give that, we give PhDs, but they must have relevance, they must not just be letters behind our names, and so on, we have got to have relevance in this world and we must be able to contribute positively to this world, and we cannot contribute positively to this world if we do not know the real values of this world. That’s what economics have got to be with anthropology, with sociology, with psychology, with theology, with philosophy. We must enjoy literature, we must enjoy all that and then we are on the road to recovery.. |
| BM: | Thank you so much for your time Dr Mofid, it was a pleasure to speak to you. |
Globalisation for the Common Good can be found on the web at http://www.globalisationforthecommongood.info